How to Successfully Pitch a Reporter to Get Interviewed & Obtain Media Coverage
By Marcia Yudkin
When I was up against a book deadline
and needed a couple of people
to interview who had achieved
business results from podcasting, I put
out a call through a service called
Help a Reporter Out.
This free service functions very much like paid reporter lead services such as Profnet
or Travel Publicity Leads. Generally media people put out such calls either when they
need interview leads extremely soon (like a deadline in two days) or when they
have rather unusual interview needs that can’t be satisfied through the usual
channels (such as looking for someone who has diabetes, owns pets and is gay
or lesbian).
Someday you may be in a position to pitch a reporter, so I’d like to help you
understand what to do and what not to do in this situation, and why, so you can seize
the opportunity to meet the reporter's needs and receive valuable media coverage.
Here is the meat of the request I made:
"Need phone interviews by end of the week with 3 podcasters who can cite specific,
tangible business results achieved through podcasting. Tell me briefly the topic of
your podcast, your URL, your results and your phone number. Thanks."
I received 30 replies. Of these, five stood out as excitingly fulfilling my criteria. At
least half of the rest put themselves completely out of the running by ignoring my
stated requirements, while several others were wasting their time and mine in their
reply for other reasons.
I’m not sure how I could have been more clear and explicit about what information
I wanted from respondents in order to screen them. I said I wanted potential
interviewees to tell me the "specific, tangible business results achieved through
podcasting." Anyone who did not say exactly how they’d gotten new opportunities or
earned money from their podcast got eliminated. Perhaps they had a great story to
tell, but they hadn’t pre-qualified themselves with me to tell it. Instead they said, in
effect, "I’m the one you want. Call me." One wrote, "We are number 1 in the world,
business results are amazing. I am so busy I would rather speak on the phone." As far
as I’m concerned, that’s hot air and does not show willingness to help me with my
story.
This may sound "Mickey Mouse," but whatever details are in the reporter’s request are
there for a reason, and it doesn’t work to ignore them. I saw much the same thing
happen when I judged a couple of business contests. The application form asked
several questions that numerous otherwise appealing candidates left blank. These
people were disqualified. The time and in some cases money they’d spent entering the
contest was for naught.
Besides those who neglected to specify their podcasting results, a few people wasted
their time by sending me contact information for someone who they said met my
criteria, such as their boss, their client or someone they knew of from afar. For
someone on a tight deadline who receives sufficient responses directly from
interviewees, this doesn’t work, either. From the underling or PR representative’s
suggestion, I have no way of knowing whether or not their referral is actually available
to talk during my time frame. If you know of someone who fits a reporter’s request,
always forward it to that person and urge them to respond right away instead of
replying on their behalf.
Another bunch of people wasted their time writing to me because they did not have a
podcast of their own but rather provided podcasting services for a fee. I’d said, "Tell
me briefly the topic of your podcast," and they’d violated that portion of my request.
One of the top five respondents whom I emailed back right away to set up a time to
talk by phone took more than 24 hours to reply. "Sorry, your email landed in my spam
folder," he said. "Here’s when I’m available today." Unfortunately, by then I’d already
completed the interviews I needed. Unfortunately too for another respondent who met
all of my criteria: He initiated contact after I’d finished all the interviews.
My advice on getting publicity by replying to reporters’ requests boils down to this:
Reply promptly. Explicitly address the stated criteria in your reply. Volunteer only
yourself. Check for the reporter’s email or phone call so you can follow through on
having caught his or her interest.
Paradoxically, by treating the media person as a prince or princess, you position
yourself to become a star.
About the Author: Marcia Yudkin is the author of 11 books, including 6 Steps to Free
Publicity and Persuading on Paper. For more information on getting a profitable round of
visibility for ideas, tips, products, services, events, expertise or controversial views,
visit Press Release Help .
By Marcia Yudkin
When I was up against a book deadline
and needed a couple of people
to interview who had achieved
business results from podcasting, I put
out a call through a service called
Help a Reporter Out.
This free service functions very much like paid reporter lead services such as Profnet
or Travel Publicity Leads. Generally media people put out such calls either when they
need interview leads extremely soon (like a deadline in two days) or when they
have rather unusual interview needs that can’t be satisfied through the usual
channels (such as looking for someone who has diabetes, owns pets and is gay
or lesbian).
Someday you may be in a position to pitch a reporter, so I’d like to help you
understand what to do and what not to do in this situation, and why, so you can seize
the opportunity to meet the reporter's needs and receive valuable media coverage.
Here is the meat of the request I made:
"Need phone interviews by end of the week with 3 podcasters who can cite specific,
tangible business results achieved through podcasting. Tell me briefly the topic of
your podcast, your URL, your results and your phone number. Thanks."
I received 30 replies. Of these, five stood out as excitingly fulfilling my criteria. At
least half of the rest put themselves completely out of the running by ignoring my
stated requirements, while several others were wasting their time and mine in their
reply for other reasons.
I’m not sure how I could have been more clear and explicit about what information
I wanted from respondents in order to screen them. I said I wanted potential
interviewees to tell me the "specific, tangible business results achieved through
podcasting." Anyone who did not say exactly how they’d gotten new opportunities or
earned money from their podcast got eliminated. Perhaps they had a great story to
tell, but they hadn’t pre-qualified themselves with me to tell it. Instead they said, in
effect, "I’m the one you want. Call me." One wrote, "We are number 1 in the world,
business results are amazing. I am so busy I would rather speak on the phone." As far
as I’m concerned, that’s hot air and does not show willingness to help me with my
story.
This may sound "Mickey Mouse," but whatever details are in the reporter’s request are
there for a reason, and it doesn’t work to ignore them. I saw much the same thing
happen when I judged a couple of business contests. The application form asked
several questions that numerous otherwise appealing candidates left blank. These
people were disqualified. The time and in some cases money they’d spent entering the
contest was for naught.
Besides those who neglected to specify their podcasting results, a few people wasted
their time by sending me contact information for someone who they said met my
criteria, such as their boss, their client or someone they knew of from afar. For
someone on a tight deadline who receives sufficient responses directly from
interviewees, this doesn’t work, either. From the underling or PR representative’s
suggestion, I have no way of knowing whether or not their referral is actually available
to talk during my time frame. If you know of someone who fits a reporter’s request,
always forward it to that person and urge them to respond right away instead of
replying on their behalf.
Another bunch of people wasted their time writing to me because they did not have a
podcast of their own but rather provided podcasting services for a fee. I’d said, "Tell
me briefly the topic of your podcast," and they’d violated that portion of my request.
One of the top five respondents whom I emailed back right away to set up a time to
talk by phone took more than 24 hours to reply. "Sorry, your email landed in my spam
folder," he said. "Here’s when I’m available today." Unfortunately, by then I’d already
completed the interviews I needed. Unfortunately too for another respondent who met
all of my criteria: He initiated contact after I’d finished all the interviews.
My advice on getting publicity by replying to reporters’ requests boils down to this:
Reply promptly. Explicitly address the stated criteria in your reply. Volunteer only
yourself. Check for the reporter’s email or phone call so you can follow through on
having caught his or her interest.
Paradoxically, by treating the media person as a prince or princess, you position
yourself to become a star.
About the Author: Marcia Yudkin is the author of 11 books, including 6 Steps to Free
Publicity and Persuading on Paper. For more information on getting a profitable round of
visibility for ideas, tips, products, services, events, expertise or controversial views,
visit Press Release Help .
Home Office Weekly is a BackPorch Publishing site Click Here to Get Your FREE SUBSCRIPTION Today! Marcia Passos Duffy, Publisher & Editor Author of Be Your Own Boss Error: unable to get links from server. Please make sure that your site supports either file_get_contents() or the cURL library. |
|
| home | business tips| office space | time tips| home life|inspiration|art|books|tools|site map|about us |
